Welcome to the TeslaFi support community.
Please enter your question, feature request, or issue below. Specific questions related to issues with your account can be sent privately by selecting "Or leave us a private message" below.
Drive Started When Polling Disabled Counts as Range Loss in Previous Idle Session
| Description | This morning on 8/10/16, I charged to 100% which ended at 5:59 am. A minute later, the site immediately enacted Scheduled Sleep Mode which disabled polling for the next 15 minutes; however, I started a drive around 6:04 or so. When polling resumed, it showed the drive start time at that time (as expected) but Idle 478 between the charge and drive shows 16.53 miles of range loss which is definitely attributed to Drive 345. I wasn't sure if you were still working on a way to better capture drives that start when polling is disabled, but it seems safe to assume that any range loss/gain when polling is turned off should be attributed to the drive or charge record following, right? Is it possible to put that into the code so the range loss is more appropriately reflected? Should the odometer reading and range reading be factored into this somehow? Can the GPS location somehow be used, too? Anyway to minimize how incorrectly this is being reported. | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steps To Reproduce | 1. Disable Polling 2. Start a Drive 3. ? 4. Profit! Actual Results: A majority, if not all, of the Range Loss in the preceeding Idle session should be attributed to the Drive session. Expected Results: Range Loss should be more accurate. | ||||
This should be corrected now. I changed the idle calculations to look to see if the idle resulted in a drive. If true, the last data point used in the idle calculation will be the last good data point in the idle session vs the first data point in the drive. This actually should provide better data for the idle session all around.
recording of charge is not right.
Sometimes i reactivate charging via smartphone app if i sit an an restaurant (e.g. car is stoping at 90% but i increase charging level to 98%).
Due to this a second charging entry is added by teslafi - the following screenshot is showing one of these double entries:
Two entries is not a problem but the second one can not be right. It is impossible to add with second charging more kWh as with the first one.
Can you please check this issue
/br Stefan
Looks like adding the temperature graph caused me to lose many...
Looks like adding the graph caused me to lose many 1,000s of miles out of the Temperature chart! Or it happened before then.
It appears the cache for your drive history was missing some data and the results were skipped during the query. I cleared out the cache and everything seems to look more appropriate now.
Please let me know if you still see any issues.
Thanks,
James
Temperature graph improvements.
Thanks for this. However, this graph is pretty difficult to read without some courser grouping of temperatures on the x-axis (I.e. rather than graphing efficiency by tenths or a degree, group into full degree -- or even five-degree -- increments). That way the graph would be much less "spikes" (see below) and more legible and useful:
Battery Report Beta
Would like to be able to compare my battery to others with the same wheel size as I have. Think it would be nice to be able to say you have either 19” or 21” wheels on the model s (in my case) and only compare battery results with others who have same parameters. Thanks.
Because of the charge taper it makes no sense to charge above 80% at Super Charger unless absolutely needed to get to the next stop or destination.It might be helpful to put a reminder on the SuperCharger page to charge and GO.
Charge to what you need to get to the next SuperCharger or destination and you will save trip time.
That usually would be charging from 15 - 60% and then GO. It is better for the battery and reduces overall trip time.
Charging over 80% in any 300 mile Tesla is usually a waste of time. Now if you have a smaller battery then your situation may be different. The SuperCharger page should have a recommendation on it for people to limit charge to 80% and GO.
This would help with thru put at SuperChargers.
TESLAFI: how can i have over 100% efficiency?
I do not understand how TESLAFI calculates "efficiency" in its charts. I am frequently over 100% efficiency on the temperature vs. mileage driven chart. How can that be?
Customer support service by UserEcho
