I spend quite a bit of time charging at my family or friends' homes. It would be great if I could schedule reports for monthly charging cost summary by location (CSV?) and have them emailed to me and the other recipient. This would not only save me the time required to log into TeslaFi to find the data, but then I wouldn't need monthly reminders to do so. This would also enable me to go a step further using IFTTT to pay the person automatically (via Paypal/Venmo) when the monthly email arrives.

I noticed today that my car got a big jump in range according to Teslafi.    Previously, 100% charge for my S75D was around 245 miles, and today its at 301 miles.  When I look at the previous history, it kinda looks like all the previous 100% charge estimations have now become the 80% estimations, going all the way back to the beginning of my logging data.

This would be useful to see how temperature might affect range loss.

This data could be used to create a second chart in the Temperature Efficiency page to show temperature versus range loss per hour

On the monthly calendar you could show a symbol for the software update. On the daily activity, I'd like line showing the software update.

A decrease in battery range due to cold battery is considered as consumption

This makes efficiency while charging to be above 100% because battery warms up and the locked energy get unlocked and counted as added energy to the battery, despite it's not actually coming from the charger

Make it possible to automatically set location specific charge limits. Using scheduling for this is a hacky workaround since
one has to have multiple rules that check if a car is at a specific location at a regular interval.

In the drive display, the battery usage is displayed as kWh used and a %. I am guessing the kWh is from the API but how is the percent calculated? I get the following on my LR AWD Model 3:

7.98 kWH at 11%

5.26 kWh  at 8%

Both drive on the same day.

This was an hour plus charge at an Electrify America Chademo running around 48kw.  TesalFI shows a 102% charging efficiency.  Wouldn’t this mean I received more kW than EA sent?

I saw a two year old similar question but that was a short term charge and something about lost data. This was a long charge that is recorded correctly, just the odd over 100% efficiency.