Would you mind terribly applying the following style adjustments to make this look just a hair more professional?  Love the site, just needs some polish!

.tableStyle, .tableStyleGrey, .tableStyleGreen {
box-shadow: 5px 5px 10px #ccc;
}

#contentliquid #content table tbody tr td {
max-width: 1em;
}

#contentliquid #content table tbody tr:first-child td:first-child {
max-width: 3em;
}

table.calendar td {
vertical-align: top;
}

Hey all --

I have a 2 week old M3 and I have all three boxes disabled for "Try to Sleep Requirements" so that it will try no matter what. The thing is, it never tries to allow the car to go to sleep.  Just idle all day long.  It's been over four hours now.

Am I doing something wrong or should TeslaFi be trying to allow the car to sleep at this point?

A convenience feature to share/open a tagged location with another app. Thinking Google maps or ride shares for city in/around travel while charging.

Ability to set a notification for cabin temperature when vehicle is:

- more than 5 degrees from target cabin temperature

- has not been moving in the last 3 minutes

- is approaching target cabin temperature (within 5 degrees)

Related metric to determine based on sensor data over time, a prediction of how long(rough guess range perhaps) on how long it will take to achieve desired cabin temperature based on historic heating/cooling sessions, weather, direction vehicle is facing, geographic location(not sure what all variables to include there for better prediction model).

Would be nice to see the charge efficiency rating over 5% increments from sat 10% to 100% as a means to fingerprint battery charging efficiency as soon as an owner links to TeslaFi, and then periodically run the same test each month, quarter, year etc. to see if battery charging efficiency is degrading over time. Currently I can only think of doing manual 5% charge intervals and colating the data in a spreadsheet. Not sure if this would require manual interval charging or if the existing days can be broken down automatically. Would make for an easy to use and qualify battery health meter. Would also potentially help owners identify the most efficient charging range for their batteries based in their driving habits/styles, as well as quantity how much money could be saved by only charging in the most efficient range. Could also help plan reduced cost of road this in areas that have high enough chargers density. Efficiency should be reflected in either or both cost and time relative to the incremented charge levels of the battery, not just per charge.

Hi

I just finished a roadtrip. On Teslafi most charges on Superchargers show 2 volts and up to 59000 ampere.

This seems strange as it would likely require extreme cables.

Is it the car reporting something odd or am I missing something?

Very early in my ownership on a few trips, I just charged up until I felt like I had enough charge. This lead to having multiple charges occur, but none being "complete" because I would unplug before both the car and the API registered as charging being complete. 

In my Charge Totals view, It only lists 3 distinct Supercharger locations, but I have charged at 5 different locations. 

Is there a bug which somehow does not detect and list charges as different locations, even though they clearly are recognized as such?

Totals List.

All the charges at "2221 Stringtown Road Supercharger" shows charges at 3 different locations.

I think the emails need to redone some how. Because there’s an early access 2019.20.5.4 we never get a notification of the lower number 5.3.  Somehow we need a notification (one) for each release no matter the order. 

Can you please identify where the miles used during a Sentry Mode session (parked) are categorized on the right hand side of a daily feed page?  Does sentry mode count in the "parked", "idled" or is it simply not included anywhere so we need to add those miles back when trying to reconcile all the miles used during a single day?  Thanks.

Looks like TeslaFi calculates the Model 3 SR+ battery size to be 50kWh... isn't it 54.5 kWh?